Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jul 3, 2020
Accepted
Jul 5, 2021
Published
Jul 5, 2021
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 529 Download : 422

Main Article Content

Abstract

The competence of organizing a highly constructed writing for the students’ publication is academically required. Thus, the students are intended to familiarize with various styles to practice. The thematic progression in this case enables to create a meaningful text as it services numerous techniques to accomplish coherence and cohesion. To accommodate them, this researcher aims to guide as well as facilitate them with manual model: the thematic progression. The virtual coaching was done in two sections: 1) The orientation of essential publication for university level through thematic progression models, and 2) The independent construction of the manuscript. The participants were gained from eight semester in majoring English Education Department of UIN Walisongo Semarang in Academic Years 2019/2020. The findings qualitatively reported that the most students increasingly showed some advances in organizing texts by realizing thematic progression technique. 

Keywords

Writing Proficiency, Thematic Progression, Cohesion, Coherence.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Muttaqin, M. Z. (2021). Maximizing an Opportunity for Practice in Realizing Students’ Writing Publication through Thematic Progression Models. ELITE JOURNAL, 3(1), 1-12. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/34

References

  1. Afrianto. (2017). Grammatical Cohesion in Students’ Writing: A Case at Universitas Teknokrat Indonesia. Leksema: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 2 (2), 97-112. https://www.ejournal.iainsurakarta.ac.id/index.php/leksema.
  2. Afzal, M., Hu, K., Chishti, M. I., & Imran, M. (2019). A Study of Pakistani English Newspaper Texts: An Application of Halliday and Hasan’s Model of Cohesion: A Discourse Analysis. International Journal of English Linguistic, 9 (5). https://doi.org//10.5539/ijel.v9v5p78.
  3. Azizah, U. A & Budiman, A. (2017). Challenges in Writing Academic Papers for International Publication among Indonesian Graduates Students. JEELS, 4 (2).
  4. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Pearson Education.
  5. Casanave, C. P., & Vandrick, S. (2008). Issues in writing for publication: writing for scholarly publication, behind the scenes in language education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  6. Chen, Q. (2019). Theme-Rheme Structure in Chinese Doctoral Students’ Research Writing from the First Draft to the Published Paper. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2004). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education.
  8. Danes, F. (1974). Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. Mouton.
  9. Dong, T., Shao, P., & Jia, J. (2016). The Study on Thematic Progression Pattern of English News. English Linguistics Research, 5 (3), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v5n3p15.
  10. Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. Continuum.
  11. Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
  12. Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2017). An Analysis of Cohesion of Exposition Texts: An Indonesian Context. Indonesia Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (3), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791.
  13. Fatmawati, D., Sinar, T. S., Ganie, R., & Yusuf, M. (2019). Thematic Progression Patterns of Short Story “The Black Cat”. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 3 (1). https:// doi.org//II.v3i1.1082.
  14. Gramley, S., & pätzold, K. M. (1992). A Survey of Modern English: Routledge Publishing.
  15. Halliday M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
  16. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. (4th). Routledge.
  17. Hassenfeld, Z. R., & Bers. M. U. (2020). Debugging the Writing Process: Lessons from a Comparison of Students’ Coding and Writing Practices. International Literacy Association, 0 (0), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1885.
  18. Hindawi, F. H. H., & Krooz, H. H. M. (2017). Cohesion and Coherence in English and Arabic: A Cross-Theoretic Study. British Journal of English Linguistics, 5 (3), 1-19. https://www.eajournals.org.
  19. Lestari, S. H. P., Mujiyanto, J., & Saleh, Murshid. S. (2019). The Use of Thematic Progression in the Journal Article of “U-Jet”. English Education Journal, 9 (4). https:///www.journal.unnes.ac.id.
  20. Lillis, T. and Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4 (1). https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.
  21. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Nolan, R., & Rocco, T. (2009). Teaching graduate students in the social sciences writing for publication. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20 (2), 267-273.
  23. Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse Analysis. Continuum.
  24. Rahma, E. N., & Swasono, E. P. (2017). Grammatical Cohesion in the Short Story “Tanya’s Reunion” by Valarie Flournoy. NOBEL: Journal of Literature and Language Teaching, 8 (1).
  25. Rahnemon, S. N., Ahangar, A. A., & Nourmohammadi, E. (2017). Thematic Structure and Translation: A Case Study of the Translation of English News into Persian. Lingua 2494, (25). https://doi.org/10.1016.
  26. Rofi’I, A., Rukmini, D., & Hartono, R. (2015). Improving Students’ Motivation in Writing Descriptive Texts by Using the Mind Mapping Technique. English Education Journal, EEJ 4 (2), 114-121. https://www.journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php.eej.
  27. Sharp, L. A. (2016). Acts of writing: A compilation of six models that define the process of writing. International Journal of Instruction, 9 (2). https://www.e-iji.net.
  28. Tamunobelema, I. (2018). The Fact of Cohesion and Coherence in Textual Harmony. British Journal of English Linguistics, 6 (4), 43-51. https://www.eajournals.org.
  29. Tardy, C. M. (2010). Writing for the World: Wikipedia as an Introduction to Academic Writing. English Teaching Forum, 1, 12-27.
  30. Trisnaningrum, Y., Alek., & Hidayat., D. N. (2019). Discourse Analysis of Grammatical Cohesion Devices in College Students’ Academic Essays Writing. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 6 (1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v6i1.12502.
  31. Trung, N. T., & Hoa. N. T. Q. (2018). An Analysis of Thematic Progression Strategies in Academic IELTS Sample Essays. International Journal of Humanities, Philosophy, and Language, 1 (4). https:// www.ijhpl.com.
  32. Yasuda, S. (2019). Children’s Meaning-Making Choices in EFL Writing: The Use of Cohesive Devices and Interpersonal Resources. System, 85. https/doi.org/10.1016.
  33. Yunita, S. (2018). Theme and Thematic Progression in Students’ Recount Texts. Indonesia Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (3), 524-530. https:// doi.org/ 10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9797.