Main Article Content

Abstract

This study explores the effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT)-based microteaching in improving students' communication skills in English. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of Communicative Language Teaching-based microteaching on students' speaking skills. Using an experimental design with a quantitative approach, this study involved a population of 7th semester students of the English Language Education Study Program at UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan, with a sample of 60 students selected randomly. The instruments used included a questionnaire, a speaking skills assessment rubric, and observations during the microteaching session. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a T-test to compare the pre-test and post-test results between the experimental and control groups. The results of the analysis showed that the experimental group experienced a significant increase in speaking skills, while the control group only experienced minimal improvement. Observations also showed that this method increased students' active participation and created a more interactive learning environment. Thus, Communicative Language Teaching-based microteaching is proven to be effective in improving students' communication skills and building their confidence in speaking English.

Keywords

Microteaching, Communicative Language Teaching, Communication Skills.

Article Details

How to Cite
Minda, S. (2026). Communicative Language Teaching-Based Microteaching. ELITE JOURNAL, 8(1), 67-84. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/302

References

  1. Ahmad, S., & Rao, C. (2013). Applying communicative approach in teaching English as a foreign language: A case study of Pakistan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention , 2 (12), 64-70.
  2. Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching . New York: Longman.
  3. Brumfit, C. (1984). Communicative methodology in language teaching . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. In JC Richards & RW Schmidt (Eds.), Language and Communication (pp. 1-47). London: Longman.
  5. Debriyanti, NC, & Iskandar, I. (2023). Communicative Language Teaching in Indonesia in the 21st Century Through Perspective of Critical Theory. UHAMKA International Conference on ELT and CALL .
  6. Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Ellis, R. (1996). How to Teach Grammar . Harlow: Longman.
  8. Febriyanti, RH (2017). The Use of Communicative Language Teaching Method in Teaching English to Tutor Teachers in Tutoring. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Factors , 4 (3), 319-328.
  9. Galloway, V. (1993). The Communicative Approach: A Practical Guide . London: HarperCollins.
  10. Hakim, IA (2022). Exploring the Challenges of Communicative Language Teaching in Indonesian Context from a Constructivist Perspective. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities , 5 (1).
  11. Hidayati, N. (2021). The Role of English Tutoring Centers in Enhancing Students' Speaking Skills: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Educational Research and Practice , 11 (3), 67-78.
  12. Horwitz, E. K. (2008). Becoming a Language Teacher: A Practical Guide to Second Language Learning and Teaching . Boston: Pearson Education.
  13. Husnaini, R. (2017). The Use of Communicative Language Teaching Approach to Teach Speaking Recount Text to Eight Grade Students of SMPN 2 Jombang.
  14. Ilmudinulloh, R., Bustomi, A., Pratiwi, WR, & Ilyas, M. (2022). Communicative Language Teaching (COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING) Approach in Kampung Inggris Pare in the New Normal Period. Journal of Learning Technology Innovation , 9 (2), 250-261.
  15. Irawati, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching in Improving Students' Speaking Skills: A Case Study at a High School in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching , 10 (2), 123-134.
  16. Kompas. (2024). New Directions of English Language Education.
  17. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring . Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
  18. Liao, P., & Zhao, Y. (2012). The Effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching in English as a Foreign Language Contexts: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Language Teaching and Research , 3 (6), 1189-1195.
  19. Magnan, S.S. (2007). The Role of Communication in Second Language Acquisition: A Review of the Literature on Communicative Competence and Its Implications for the Classroom. Foreign Language Annals , 40 (4), 546-563.
  20. Marcellino, M. (2008). English Language Teaching in Indonesia: A Continuous Challenge in Education and Cultural Diversity. TEFLIN Journal , 19 (1).
  21. Nunan, D. (1991). Communicative Tasks and the Language Curriculum . TESOL Quarterly , 25 (2), 279-295.
  22. Rahmawati, A. (2021). The Impact of Students' Motivation on Their English Language Learning Achievement: A Study at a Senior High School in Indonesia. Journal of Language Teaching and Research , 12(3), 453-461.
  23. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching: A Description and Analysis.
  25. Sari, R., & Putri, E. (2023). Teacher Readiness in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching: Challenges and Solutions in Indonesian Context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics , 13 (1), 45-56.
  26. Savignon, S. J. (2002). Communicative Language Teaching: Historical Context and Current Developments . In JC Richards & WA Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice (pp. 3-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Viva. (2023). Indonesia's English Achievement Lags Behind: Ranking 79 out of 113 Countries.