Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 3, 2020
Accepted
Jun 25, 2020
Published
Jun 29, 2020
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 665 Download : 448

Main Article Content

Abstract

Measuring the performance of language is a challenge to the education system in every education level. In measuring the performance of language, the analysis should be conducted in each individual to find the best understanding of the learners’ real performance of language ability on language learning. Conventionally, the test evaluator is evaluating the achievement by using a one-time test to analyze the language achievement in a time-saving and simple evaluation. While the conventional evaluation method seems to be practical, the result of the evaluation is only revealing the language achievement on the day the test is administered by ignoring the dynamics of the language acquisition of the learners. the research is dealing with implementing a new method in understanding language acquisition of the performers. The research employs descriptive-quantitative method and gathering the data in a series of 4 times data collections by using specific task to the students in English department of UMM as the purposively selected subjects. Following the data collection, the analysis is conducted in a series of 4 analyses to show the ‘movement’ or the dynamics of the language performance and use.Based on the result, the research validates the dynamics system analysis as a new method of measuring language performance in detail.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Adityo, A. (2020). Dynamics System Analysis in Measuring English Language Performance . ELITE JOURNAL, 2(1), 1-8. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/30

References

  1. Abbott, M. L. (2009). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics - By Z. Dörnyei. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 207–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00223.x
  2. Adityo, A; Wardani, A. (2019). Utilization of Application Program in Supporting Assessment of English Performance, 8(1), 107–116.
  3. Adityo, A. (2015). Teachnology in Digital Nativeness : Enhancing Technology as Invisible Media. Erudio ( Journal of Educational Innovation), 3, 46–54.
  4. Baronchelli, A., Chater, N., Christiansen, M. H., & Pastor-Satorras, R. (2013). Evolution in a Changing Environment. PLoS ONE, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052742
  5. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of english. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029
  6. Park, E. S. (2013). Learner-generated noticing behavior by novice learners: Tracing the effects of learners’ L1 on their emerging L2. Applied Linguistics, 34(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams016
  7. Polat, B., & Kim, Y. (2014). Dynamics of complexity and accuracy: A longitudinal case study of advanced untutored development. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt013
  8. Wolter, B., & Yamashita, J. (2017). Word Frequency, Collocational Frequency, L1 Congruency, and Proficiency in L2 Collocational Processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000237