Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 3, 2020
Accepted
Jun 25, 2020
Published
Jun 30, 2020
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 585 Download : 466

Main Article Content

Abstract

In fiction study traditional class is complicated. It always challenges to teach students fiction. They do not appreciate literature pieces as much as teacher used to in those good old days. It notices that students these days do not read many literature pieces or getting students to read the text before class. This happens also in Elements of Prose class in English Department at UIN Sunan Kalijaga. One solution to this problem that is discussed in this study is mixed method between face to face-classroom with online learning that is called blended learning. Blended learning goes beyond barriers of time, location, and culture and has created many enhanced opportunities for learners and instructors. It is effective because it allows students to read e-book versions and in classroom time, they are more focus and active on meaningful activities related with their learning materials.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
-, U. R. S. (2020). Designing Blended Learning Materials for Functional Texts in Fiction Study. ELITE JOURNAL, 2(1), 85-102. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/27

References

  1. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J. and Garrett, R. 2007. Blending In: The extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved 23 Desember 2018, from http://www.sloanc.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf.
  2. Anderson, T. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning. (2nd ed.).Athabasca University Press.
  3. Brooke, Elizabeth. Four Keys to Success Using Blended Learning Implementation Models. https://www.lexialearning.com/sites/default/files/resources/Blended%20learning_WhitePaper_OverviewImplementation_4Keys.pdf/. 2017. Accessed on 30 Dec 2017
  4. Carter, R., & Long, M. (1991). Teaching Literature. New York: Longman.
  5. Delialioğlu, Ö. (2012). Student Engagement in Blended Learning Environments with Lecture-Based and problem-based Instructional Approaches. Journal of Educational Technology&Society, 15(3), 310–322. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.15.3.310
  6. Garrison, D. R., and Kanuka, H. 2004. Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education 7, no. 2: 95–105.
  7. Garrison, D. R. and Vaughan, N. 2008. Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  8. Gόmez, J. and Igado, M., 2008. Blended Learning: The Key to Success in a Training Company, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 5(8), 33-42.
  9. Graham, C.R., S. Allen, and D. Ure. 2005. Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Encyclopedia of information science and technology, ed. M. Khosrow-Pour, 253–9. Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
  10. Graham, C.R. and Bonk, C. J. 2006. The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, ed. C.J. Bonk and C.R. Graham. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  11. Graves, Kathleen. 2000. Designing language courses: A guide for teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  12. Güzer, B and Caner, H. 2014. The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 4596 – 4603.
  13. Huang, R., and Y. Zhou. 2006. Designing blended learning focused on knowledge category and learning activities: Case studies from Beijing Normal University. In The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, ed. C. Bonk and C. Graham, 296–310. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.
  14. J. Gόmez and M. Igado, Blended Learning: The Key to Success in a Training Company, International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, (2008), 5(8), 33-42.
  15. Laster, S., G. Otte, A.G. Picciano, and S. Sorg. 2005. Redefining blended learning. Paper presented at the Sloan-C Workshop on Blended Learning, April 18, in Chicago, IL.
  16. Lionarakis, A., and D. Parademetriou. 2003. The quality of the learning experience: A comparative study between open distance and conventional education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 4, no. 2. http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde10/articles/lionarakis.htm.
  17. Martyn, M. (2003). "The hybrid online model: Good practice". Educausem Quarterly: 18–23.
  18. Musthafa, B. (2015). Seven Issues and Dilemmas in Literature Teaching in EFL Context: Lessons from Indonesia. To appear in Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics
  19. Oliver, R., and J. Herrington. 2003. Factors influencing quality online learning experiences. In Quality education @ a distance, ed. G. Davies and E. Stacey, 137–42. London: Kluwer Academic.
  20. Picciano, A. G. 2006 “Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks,10(3), 95-102.
  21. Reichlmayr, T. 2005. Experience with blended learning techniques. Paper presented at the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 19–22, in Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  22. Rodanski, B. 2006. Dynamic web-based tutorial tool. In Proceedings of the IEEE Seventh International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education & Training (ITHET 2006), 67–70. Washington, DC: IEEE Publications.
  23. Rooney, J.E. 2003. Blending learning opportunities to enhance educational programming and meetings. Association Management 55, no. 5: 26–32.
  24. Ross, B., and K. Gage. 2006. Global perspectives on blended learning: Insight from WebCT and our customers in higher education. In The handbook of blended learning: Globalperspectives, local designs, ed. C. Bonk and C. Graham, 155–68. San Francisco, CA:Pfeiffer.
  25. Sharma, P. and Barret, B. 2007 Blended Learning Using Technology in and beyond the language classroom. Oxford: Macmillan Publisher.
  26. Lalima and Dangwal, K. L. 2017 Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach.
  27. Universal Journal of Educational Research 5(1): 129-136, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050116
  28. Vernadakis, N. et all. 2012. The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ Performance. Procedia Technology 1 439 – 443 2212-0173 doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098
  29. Wend, P. 2006. Towards a joined-up student learning experience at Oxford Brookes University. Brookes e-Journal of Learning and Teaching 2, no.1. http://bejlt.brookes.ac.uk/article/towards_a_joined_up_student_learning_experience_at_oxford_brookes_ university/.