Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jun 26, 2024
Accepted
Jul 22, 2024
Published
Jun 30, 2024
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 1031 Download : 665

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research investigates the linguistic ecology of Makassar’s green spaces and its role in navigating environmental awareness through language. Focusing on popular landmarks in Makassar City, including Losari Beach, Fort Rotterdam, Taman Macan and Lapangan Karebosi, the study examines the language used in signage (signs and information boards) plays related to environmental conservation and green space management. Through a combination of linguistics analysis and qualitative research method, this research comprises documentation and survey in gathering data. There are 60 respondents contribute in the survey (visitors, residents who live around the public green spaces, stakeholders, and groups of community). The findings identify that there are prevalent language patterns used in signage related to environmental awareness and green space management in Makassar’s popular landmarks; language influences people perception, attitudes, and behavior towards environmental conservation and sustainability practices in Makassar’s green spaces through several mechanism including narratives and framing, cultural relevance, accessibility and inclusivity, targeted communication, education and awareness, as well as social norms and peer influence. In conclusion, this research contribute to the understanding of the intricate relationship between language, environment, and society, with implications for environmental education, communication strategies, and policy interventions aimed at fostering greater environmental consciousness in urban setting like Makassar.
Keywords: Linguistics Ecology, Environmental Awareness, Urban Sustainability, Green Spaces, Makassar City.

Keywords

linguistics ecology Environmental Awareness Urban Sustainability Green Spaces makassar city

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Asnur, S. M., & Djamaluddin, J. (2024). Linguistic Ecology of Makassar’s Green Spaces: Navigating Environmental Awareness through Language. ELITE JOURNAL, 6(1), 1-22. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/226

References

  1. Barthel, S., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (2015). "Urban Green Spaces and The Potential for Health Improvement and Environmental Justice in A Changing Climate." Nature Climate Change.
  2. Bilandzic, H., & Sukalla, F. (2019). The Role of Fictional Film Exposure and Narrative Engagement for Personal Norms, Guilt and Intentions to Protect The Climate. Environmental Communication, 13(8), 1069-1086.
  3. Cox, R. (2018). "Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere." Sage Publications.
  4. Dearborn, D. C., & Kark, S. (2010). "Motivations for Conserving Urban Biodiversity." Conservation Biology.
  5. Döring, M., Penz, H., & Trampe, W. (Eds.). (2008). Language, Signs and Nature: Ecolinguistic Dimensions of Environmental Discourse: L. Stauffenburg Verlag.
  6. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
  7. Fill, A., & Penz, H. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Routledge.
  8. Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford University Press, USA.
  9. Gal, S. (2020). Language and Environment. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49, 115-130.
  10. Gazzola, M. (2023). Language policy as public policy. In Epistemological and theoretical foundations in language policy and planning (pp. 41-71). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  11. Gazzola, M., Templin, T., & McEntee-Atalianis, L. J. (2020). Measuring diversity in multilingual communication. Social Indicators Research, 147(2), 545-566.
  12. Gorter, D. (2006). Linguistic landscape: A new approach to multilingualism. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  13. Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2021). Toward a new conceptualisation of language revitalisation. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 42(10), 911-926.
  14. Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford University Press.
  15. Holmes, B. (2011). Citizens' engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Canberra: Parliamentary Library.
  16. Houston, Donna, Jean Hillier, Diana MacCallum, Wendy Steele, and Jason Byrne. "Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’in planning theory." Planning theory 17, no. 2 (2018): 190-212.
  17. Indriyani, V., Atmazaki, A., & Ramadhan, S. (2024, February). Promoting Environmental Awareness through language learning: A study on the Integration of Environmental Education in The Classroom. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 3001, No. 1). AIP Publishing.
  18. Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49.
  19. Moser, S. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 31-53.
  20. Moser, S. C., & Dilling, L. (2011). Communicating climate change: Closing the science-action gap. The Oxford handbook of climate change and society, 161-174.
  21. Mühlhäusler, P. (2002). Linguistic ecology: Language change and linguistic imperialism in the Pacific region. Routledge.
  22. Nguyen, H., & Brown, S. (2020). Communicative Strategies for Environmental Management: The Role of Language in Green Initiatives. Journal of Environmental Management and Sustainability, 2(1), 45-60.
  23. Pakarinen, S., & Björklund, S. (2018). Multiple language signage in linguistic landscapes and students’ language practices: A case study from a language immersion setting. Linguistics and Education, 44, 4-11.
  24. Pezzullo, P. C., & Liu, J. (2021). Rethinking publics and environmental communication in Western and Eastern cultures. The Handbook of International Trends in Environmental Communication, 206-219.
  25. Pietikäinen, Sari, and Helen Kelly-Holmes. (2013). Multilingualism and the Periphery. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics (New York, 2013; online edn, Oxford Academic, 23 May 2013), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945177.003.0001, accessed 26 June 2024
  26. Schäfer, M. S., & Schlichting, I. (2014). Media Representations of Climate Change: A Meta-Analysis of the Research Field. Environmental Communication, 8(2), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.914050
  27. Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2015). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 21–34.
  28. Vargas-Hernández, J.G., Pallagst, K., Zdunek-Wielgołaska, J. (2018). Urban Green Spaces as a Component of an Ecosystem. In: Marques, J. (eds) Handbook of Engaged Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71312-0_49