Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 27, 2023
Published
May 26, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 3371 Download : 1844

Main Article Content

Abstract





ABSTRACT


Dialogic education refers to the interaction occurred in a group work dialogue between teacher and students. It is not limited to written and verbal discourse; it also encompasses the broader notion that the interaction of diverse ideas can result in mutual insights. The concept of dialogic education involves how teachers elicit students' 'common sense' perspectives through classroom dialogue, interact with their emerging ideas, and assist students in overcoming misunderstandings during the learning process. By analyzing and creating dialogic interactions principals in the classroom, dialogic education not only stimulates broader and more comprehensive thinking and learning among students, but it also transforms classroom relationships, realigning the conventional power structure between teachers and students. This paper reviews the importance of the dialogic education by giving discussion on the models of the dialogic education, the approaches to study the dialogic education, and its implementation across countries. This paper also concludes the review by adding some future research direction according to the novelty and gaps from the earlier literature.


 


Keywords: conversation analysis, corpus linguistics, dialogic education, sociocultural discourse analysis, thematic content analysis





Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Nimasari, E. P., Setiawan, S., Munir, A., & Suhartono. (2023). The dialogic Education: Models, Approaches, and its Implementation. ELITE JOURNAL, 5(2), 389-402. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/149

References

  1. Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
  2. Anderson, R. (2007). Thematic Content Analysis ( TCA ) 1 Descriptive Presentation of Qualitative Data. Online, 15, 1–4.
  3. Asanjarani, F., & Asgari, M. (2021). Effects of a school-based program on Iranian students’ well-being. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 9(sup1), S103–S112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1758858
  4. Asghar, M., & Pilkington, R. (2018). The relational value of professional dialogue for academics pursuing HEA fellowship. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2017.1386566
  5. Brubacher, S. P., Powell, M., Skouteris, H., & Guadagno, B. (2014). An investigation of the question-types teachers use to elicit information from children. Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2014.5
  6. Chapin, S. H., O’Connor, C., & Anderson, N. C. (2003). Classroom Discussions: Using Math to Help Students Learn (T. Gordon, Ed.). Math Solutions Publications.
  7. Chien, C. W. (2021). Taiwanese elementary school english teachers’ practice of teacher leadership in professional dialogue. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2021.1953611
  8. Church, A., & Bateman, A. (2020). Conversation analytic role-play method (CARM) for early childhood teacher education. Teacher Development, 24(5), 652–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2020.1820371
  9. Cui, R., & Teo, P. (2021). Dialogic education for classroom teaching: A critical review. Language and Education, 35(3), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1837859
  10. Deppermann, A., & Pekarek Doehler, S. (2021). Longitudinal Conversation Analysis—Introduction to the Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899707
  11. Finkelstein, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2021). The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: A scoping review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1572232
  12. Fisher, R. (2007). Dialogic teaching: Developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion. Early Child Development and Care, 177(6–7), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701378985
  13. Guzmán, V., & Larrain, A. (2021). The transformation of pedagogical practices into dialogic teaching: Towards a dialogic notion of teacher learning. Professional Development in Education, 00(00), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2021.1902837
  14. Haneda, M. (2017). Dialogic learning and teaching across diverse contexts: Promises and challenges. Language and Education, 31(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2016.1230128
  15. Hennessy, S., Calcagni, E., Leung, A., & Mercer, N. (2021). An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning. Language and Education, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2021.1956943
  16. Hill, G., & Vaughan, S. (2018). Conversations about research supervision–Enabling and accrediting a community of practice model for research degree supervisor development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(2), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1406388
  17. Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
  18. Howe, C., Hennessy, S., Mercer, N., Vrikki, M., & Wheatley, L. (2019). Teacher–student dialogue during classroom teaching: Does it really impact on student outcomes? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4–5), 462–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730
  19. Huang, A., Klein, M., & Beck, A. (2020). An exploration of teacher learning through reflection from a sociocultural and dialogical perspective: Professional dialogue or professional monologue? Professional Development in Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1787192
  20. Johnson, M., & Mercer, N. (2019). Using sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse professional discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(October 2018), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.04.003
  21. Kheradmand Saadi, Z. (2016). Meaning making, agency, and languaging in dialogic interactions on academic writing tasks: A sociocultural discourse analysis. Online Submission, January.
  22. Larkin, D. (2017). Planning for the elicitation of students’ ideas: A lesson study approach with preservice science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(5), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1352410
  23. Longo, Y., Coyne, I., & Joseph, S. (2017). The scales of general well-being (SGWB). Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.005
  24. Longo, Y., Coyne, I., & Joseph, S. (2018). Development of the short version of the scales of general well-Being: The 14-item SGWB. Personality and Individual Differences, 124(November 2017), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.11.042
  25. López-Garcia, V., & Rodríguez-Inés, P. (2019). Learning corpus linguistics tools and techniques to cope with the current challenges of audiovisual translation. Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 13(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656409
  26. Mahatmya, D., Thurston, M., & Lynch, M. E. (2018). Developing students’ well-being through integrative, experiential learning courses. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 55(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2018.1474756
  27. Mantei, J., & Kervin, L. (2011). Turning into teachers before our eyes: The development of professional identity through professional dialogue. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n9.1
  28. Mercer, N. (2013). The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804394
  29. Mercer, N. (2019a). Language and the joint creation of knowledge: The selected works of Neil Mercer. In Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge: The Selected Works of Neil Mercer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400759
  30. Mercer, N. (2019b). Sociocultural discourse analysis. Language and the Joint Creation of Knowledge, 1, 156–186. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429400759-9
  31. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, J. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780902954273
  32. Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2019). Dialogue, thinking together and digital technology in the classroom: Some educational implications of a continuing line of inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 97(March), 187–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2017.08.007
  33. Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Major, L. (2019). The routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. In The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441677
  34. Meredith, J. (2019). Conversation Analysis and Online Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 52(3), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2019.1631040
  35. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., & Resnick, L. B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9071-1
  36. Milatz, A., Lüftenegger, M., & Schober, B. (2015). Teachers’ relationship closeness with students as a resource for teacher wellbeing: A response surface analytical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(DEC), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01949
  37. Molinari, L., & Mameli, C. (2010). Classroom dialogic discourse: An observational study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 3857–3860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.604
  38. Nystrand, M., Wu, L. L., Gamoran, A., Zeiser, S., & Long, D. A. (2003). Questions in Time: Investigating the Structure and Dynamics of Unfolding Classroom Discourse. Discourse Processes, 35(2), 135–198. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3502_3
  39. Peel, K. L. (2021). Professional dialogue in researcher-teacher collaborations: Exploring practices for effective student learning. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(2), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1855061
  40. Peled-Elhanan, N., & Blum-Kulka, S. (2006). Dialogue in the Israeli classroom: Types of teacher-student talk. Language and Education, 20(2), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780608668716
  41. Pilkington, R. (2013). Professional dialogues: Exploring an alternative means of assessing the professional learning of experienced HE academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), 251–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.717225
  42. Pilkington, R. (2019). Investigating the use of ‘professional dialogues’ when assessing academic practice: Revealing learning, managing process, and enabling judgements. International Journal for Academic Development, 24(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2018.1512496
  43. Ritella, G., & Ligorio, B. (2019). Dialogical approaches to learning: From theory to practice and back. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 20, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.001
  44. Schaeffer, N. C. (2021). Interaction before and during the survey interview: Insights from conversation analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1824626
  45. Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.
  46. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
  47. Sibomana, E. (2022). Transitioning from a local language to English as a medium of instruction: Rwandan teachers’ and classroom-based perspectives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(4), 1259–1274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1749554
  48. Simoncini, K. M., Lasen, M., & Rocco, S. (2014). Professional dialogue, reflective practice and teacher research: Engaging early childhood pre-service teachers in collegial dialogue about curriculum innovation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n1.3
  49. Singh, K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2021). Enhancing college students well-being: The psycho-spiritual well-being intervention. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 31(7), 867–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1823294
  50. Song, Y. (2015). An investigation into participation in classroom dialogue in mainland China. Cogent Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1065571
  51. Teo, P. (2016). Exploring the dialogic space in teaching: A study of teacher talk in the pre-university classroom in Singapore. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.019
  52. Thomson, K. E., & Trigwell, K. R. (2018). The role of informal conversations in developing university teaching? Studies in Higher Education, 43(9), 1536–1547. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1265498
  53. Twiner, A., Littleton, K., Whitelock, D., & Coffin, C. (2021). Combining sociocultural discourse analysis and multimodal analysis to explore teachers’ and pupils’ meaning making. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30(PA), 100520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100520
  54. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12048