Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 27, 2023
Published
May 23, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 527 Download : 619

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to describe the use of teacher video feedback on students’ academic writing and the students’ ability in writing by using this technique. The use of teacher video feedback was analyzed by using qualitative method. The results of the analysis reveals that the teacher video feedback has many benefits and can be used in the class. From 10 students’ academic writings analyzed, teacher video feedback also influences the students’ scores in content for eight students (80%), organization for six students (60%), vocabulary for seven students (70%), language use for eight students (80%) and mechanics for four students (40%). They also easily revise and edit their writings in terms of content, organization, vocabulary, and language use than mechanics due to unconstructive feedback given by the teacher in mechanics.


 


Keywords: teacher video feedback, academic text, writing components, writing skill.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fatoni, M., Setiawan, S., & Munir, A. (2023). Teacher Video Feedback on Academic Writing Class and Writing Performance: Switch from Text to Video. ELITE JOURNAL, 5(2), 375-382. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/147

References

  1. Ali, A. D. (2016). Effectiveness of Using Screencast Feedback on EFL Students’ Writing and Perception. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 106–121.
  2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. K. (2010). Introduction to research in education . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 8(2), 115–129.
  3. Borg, E., & Deane, M. (2011). Measuring the outcomes of individualised writing instruction: a multilayered approach to capturing changes in students’ texts. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(3), 319–331.
  4. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8
  5. Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J. (2022). Exploring teacher perceptions of different types of ‘feedback practices’ in higher education: implications for teacher feedback literacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074
  6. Cheng, D., & Li, M. (2020). Screencast Video Feedback in Online TESOL Classes. Computers and Composition, 58, 102612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2020.102612
  7. Cunningham, K. J. (2019). Student Perceptions and Use of Technology-Mediated Text and Screencast Feedback in ESL Writing. Computers and Composition, 52, 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.02.003
  8. Denton, D. W. (2014). Using screen capture feedback to improve academic performance. TechTrends, 58(6), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0803-0
  9. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1992). Holistic writing assessment for LEP students. Proceedings of the Second National Research Symposium on Limited English Proficient Student Issues: Focus on Evaluation and Measurement, 2, 317–358.
  10. Hattie, J. (2007). Timperley (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 88–118.
  11. Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1).
  12. Marrs, S., Zumbrunn, S., McBride, C., & Stringer, J. K. (2016). Exploring Elementary Student Perceptions of Writing Feedback. Journal on Educational Psychology, 10(1), 16–28.
  13. Mathieson, K. (2012). Exploring student perceptions of audiovisual feedback via screencasting in online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 26(3), 143–156.
  14. Matthews, L. (2019). Should we use video technology for giving feedback? Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2019.1669480
  15. Morton, J., Storch, N., & Thompson, C. (2014). Feedback on writing in the supervision of postgraduate students: Insights from the work of Vygotsky and Bakhtin. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A24–A36.
  16. Orlando, J. (2016). A comparison of text, voice, and screencasting feedback to online students. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 156–166.
  17. Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J. (2012). Should online doctoral instructors adopt audio feedback as an instructional strategy? Preliminary evidence. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 7.
  18. Sharp, J. (2012). Success with your education research project. Success with Your Education Research Project, 1–152.
  19. Silva, M. L. (2012). Camtasia in the classroom: Student attitudes and preferences for video commentary or Microsoft Word comments during the revision process. Computers and Composition, 29(1), 1–22.
  20. Silva, M. L. (2017). Commenting with Camtasia: A descriptive study of the affordances and constraints of peer-to-peer screencast feedback. Research on Writing: Multiple Perspectives, 325–346.
  21. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
  22. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in education: An introduction. Allyn & Bacon.