Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 26, 2023
Published
May 23, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 549 Download : 1286

Main Article Content

Abstract

Culture can practically affect the bureaucracy, it can even become the identity of a bureaucracy called bureaucratic culture. The culture that forms the bureaucracy does not only come from local Indonesian culture but also global culture. This article is intended to analyze how global culture in practice affects the bureaucracy, especially the bureaucracy in carrying out its performance. The method used in this article is a descriptive method with a qualitative approach. The analysis revealed that global culture practically affects the performance of a better bureaucracy (Eu-consequences), which means that the Indonesian bureaucracy is currently oriented to achieve procedural, disciplined, professional, and responsive to public services. The global culture affects the bureaucracy either naturally through adoption by individuals in the organization, or structured through regulations regarding organizational cultural values ​that need to be practiced by individuals in the organization.


 


Keywords: Bureaucracy, Global Culture, Performance.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Herdiana, D. (2023). How Does Global Culture Affect the Performance of Indonesian Bureaucracy?. ELITE JOURNAL, 5(2), 315-322. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/140

References

  1. Abidin, Zaenal As. 2016. “Menanamkan Konsep Multikulturalisme Di Indonesia.” Dinamika Global 1(2): 123–40.
  2. Afandi, and Munif. 2018. “Potret Masyarakat Multikutural Di Indonesia.” Journal MULTICULTURAL of Islamic Edication 2(1): 1–10.
  3. Akil, Muhammad Anshar. 2012. “Teknologi Komunikasi Dan Informasi Sektor Publik (Studi Electronic Government Di Indonesia).” Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh 13(1): 31–46.
  4. Aprianti, Muthia, Dinie Anggraeni Dewi, and Yayang Furi Furnamasari. 2022. “Kebudayaan Indonesia Di Era Globalisasi Terhadap Identitas Nasional Indonesia.” Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan 6(1): 996–98.
  5. Creswell, John W. 2007. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  6. Kementerian PANRB RI. 2015. Survey Persepsi 9 Program Reformasi Birokrasi. Jakarta. https://www.menpan.go.id/site/download/file/5025-survey-persepsi-9-program-reformasi-birokrasi.
  7. Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia. 2020. “Urgensi Transformasi Pelayanan Publik Melalui E-Government Pada New Normal Dan Reformasi Regulasi Birokrasi.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 3(2): 220–31.
  8. Nahak, Hildigardis M.I. 2019. “Upaya Melestarikan Budaya Indonesia Di Era Globalisasi.” Jurnal Sosiologi Nusantara 5(1): 165–76.
  9. Ngafifi, Muhamad. 2014. “Kemajuan Teknologi Dan Pola Hidup Manusia Dalam Perspektif Sosial Budaya.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi 2(1): 33–47.
  10. Pratama, Rizky Hersya, Abdul Hakim, and Muhammad Shobaruddin. 2015. “Pelayanan Publik Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (TIK), Elektronik Rukun Tetangga/Rukun Warga (e-RT/RW (Studi e-Governmentdi Kelurahan Ketintang Kecamatan Gayungan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya).” Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP) 3(12): 2128–34.
  11. Romli, Lili. 2008. “Masalah Reformasi Birokrasi.” Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS 2(2): 1–8.
  12. Rosidah. 2005. “Patologi Birokrasi Dalam Organisasi Publik Dan Usaha Pencegahannya.” Jurnal Informasi XXX1(1): 63–69.
  13. Ruslan, Idrus. 2015. “Penguatan Ketahanan Budaya Dalam Menghadapi Derasnya Arus Budaya Asing.” Jurnal TAPIs 11(1): 1–19.
  14. Yusriadi. 2018. “Reformasi Birokrasi Indonesia: Peluang Dan Hambatan.” Jurnal Administrasi Publik 8(2): 178–85.