Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT
Blended learning offers numerous benefits to language learning and teaching. The benefits attract higher education institutions to implement the blended learning for advancing students’ learning outcome. The need to boost students’ learning outcome occurs simultaneously with the demand for higher education institutions to measure students’ English proficiency. Consequently, certain English proficiency test is required for students’ admission and students’ graduation. Thus, this paper aimed to offer new blended learning technique to boost students’ learning outcome and simultaneously to prepare students taking certain English proficiency tests. English Discoveries (ED) from Edusoft, as a tertiary from Educational Testing Service (ETS) was selected as learning management system (LMS) due to its vast topics and language skills coverage. Comprehensive materials and diverse practices from ED were used to be the resources for test formats familiarity. This study has shown that ED materials and practices were similar with TOEIC Listening and Reading sections and TOEFL ITP Listening, Structure and Written Expression, and Reading section. By learning in blended environment with ED, students were predicted to be more familiar with TOEIC and TOEFL ITP test formats. Being familiarized with the test formats should increase the possibility for students to have higher English proficiency score.


Keywords: blended learning; test format familiarity

Article Details

How to Cite
Abdur Rohim, A., Purwati, O., Anam, S., & Munir, A. (2023). Constructing a New Blended Learning Technique: Using English Discovery as Learning Management System for Test Format Familiarity. ELITE JOURNAL, 5(2), 253-266. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/134

References

  1. Ahmadi, D., & Reza, M. (2018). The Use of Technology in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3, 115-125. Https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.2.115
  2. Allen, I. E., & Seaman. J. (2003). Seizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Wellesley, MA: Sloan Consortium.
  3. Anikina, Oksana & Yakimenko, Elena. (2015). Edutainment as a Modern Technology of Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 166. 475-479. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.558.
  4. Bachman, L. (1990) Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford. 
  5. Cohen, J. (1998) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
  6. Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2001, October). Emerging research issues in distributed learning [Conference presentation]. 7th Sloan-C International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks, Orlando, FL, United States.
  7. Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2011). A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(4), 236–241.
  8. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., & Moskal, P. (2004, March 30). Blended learning. EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. http://connect.educause.edu/Library/ECAR/BlendedLearning/40089.
  9. Dziuban, Chuck & Hartman, J.L. & Cavanagh, Thomas & Moskal, Patsy. (2018). Blended Courses as Drivers of Institutional Transformation. Blended Learning across Disciplines: Models for Implementation. 17-37. 10.4018/978-1-60960-479-0.ch002.
  10. Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002, March 20). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with technology Today (6, Vol.8).
  11. Graham, C. R. (2006). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In M. G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education, (3rd ed., pp. 333–350). New York: Routledge.
  12. Hashim, H. (2018). Application of Technology in the Digital Era Education. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 2, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.24036/002za0002
  13. Houston, S. E. (2005). Test-wiseness training: An investigation of the impact of test-wiseness in an employment setting. Dissertation. The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron.
  14. Jackman, W. (2018). Switching from Traditional to Blended Learning at University Level: Students’ and Lecturers’ Experiences. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research. 17. 10.26803/ijlter.17.5.1.
  15. Papadima-Sophocleous, S., Giannikas, C. N., & Kakoulli-Constantinou, E. (2014). ICT in EFL: The global effect of new technologies in the language classroom. In S. Jager, L. Bradley, E. J. Meima, & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL Design: Principles and Practice; Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 296-300). Dublin: Research-publishing.net. doi:10.14705/rpnet.2014.000234
  16. Picciano, A. G. (2011). Introduction to the special issue on transitioning to blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 3-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v15i1.195
  17. Pun, Min. (2013). The Use of Multimedia Technology in English Language Teaching: A Global Perspective. Crossing the Border: International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 1. 10.3126/ctbijis.v1i1.10466.
  18. Rosicka, Zdena & Hošková-Mayerová, Šárka. (2014). Motivation to Study and Work with Talented Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 114. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.691.
  19. Shyamlee, S. D., & Phil, M. (2012). Use of Technology in English Language Teaching and Learning: An Analysis. In International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture (Vol. 33, pp. 150-156).