Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe how double-blind peer review implementing in student paragraph writing classes of English students at STKIP PGRI Jombang. This study uses the phenomenon of qualitative descriptive data aims to identify student writing descriptive text performance from English classes in descriptive text and content analysis procedure. The expert reviewers are English lecturers in the same field of English language teaching. The result of this research double-blind peer review works well to present valid data about students’ writing performance in paragraph writing class, especially in their descriptive, and found some novelty. The research novelty of students writing often begin texts (is, are, has, have, been to) with connecting verbs or relational processes to categorize and describe appearances or characteristics. Second, Use mental verbs or mental processes when describing emotions. Third, use adjectives and adverbs to add information to nouns (participants) and verbs (actions) to provide a more detailed description of the subject and make the text clearer. Fourth, Use adverb phrases to add more type, place, or time information. To make the text easier to read, it is sometimes achieved with contextual embedded sentences.
Keywords: Double-Blind Peer Review, Paragraph Writing, Writing Skill
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
- Abisamra, Nada. 2001. Teaching Writing Approach & Activities. Alawi, F.F. (2011). Improving Students’ Ability in Writing Descriptive Text Using Clustering Technique. Journal of English Language Teaching. Vol 2. No.2, 2011. (http://www.jstor.org/stable/40014588). Accessed at 24 August, 2022
- Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An explode ed. Sydney: National Centre for English Teaching and Research. Macquarie University. (Shorturl.at/zKU47). Accessed at 24 August, 2022
- Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. (2nd Ed.). New York: Longman. New York, United Stated: Sage Publications.
- Gerot, L., & Wignel, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. Queensland: Gerd
- Stabler, AEE Publishing. Accessed at 24 August, 2022.
- Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises. AEE Publishing. Accessed at 24 August, 2022
- Grellet, F. 1990. Developing Reading Skill. New York: Cambridge University Press. AEE
- Publishing. Accessed at 24 August, 2022.
- Kelly, J., Sadeghieh, T., & Adeli, K. (2014). Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. EJIFCC, 25(3), 227–243. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4975196/). Accessed at 29 March, 2022
- Radzvilas, M., De Pretis, F., Peden, W., Tortoli, D., & Osimani, B. (2020). Double blind vs. open review: an evolutionary game logit-simulating the behavior of authors and reviewers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.07797. (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.07797). Accessed at 22 July, 2022
- Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing: Luyện viết luận tiếng anh:trình độ trung cấp & nâng Cao. Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh. New York, United Stated. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
- Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English. New York, United Stated.
- Pearson: Longman. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
- Wichadee, S. (2013). Peer feedback on Facebook: The use of social networking websites to develop writing ability of undergraduate students. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(4), 260-270. (https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/155871). Accessed at 29 March, 2022