Article Sidebar

Submitted
Jan 6, 2023
Published
Jan 25, 2023
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 817 Download : 665

Main Article Content

Abstract

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study is based on exploratory research to identify “Challenges in Quality of Education in HEIs of Pakistan”. The exploratory research approach is used to achieve the objectives of the study in less time and with inexpensive means. Pakistan is facing a lot of challenges in the education sector such as curriculum, few training institutions, corruption in education, teacher behavior, and less research work. The purpose of our research is to identify the major challenges in the educational sector in Pakistan which the educational sector is suffering for the last few years. The researcher used triangulation to carry out the reliability and validity of the data for results. So, to conduct this triangulation the researcher used questionnaires for the students, questionnaires for the teachers, and interviews with the management. . In this regard primary data was collected from the focused group of students using a sample of 100 questionnaires for each university were filled by the students of the selected five universities. The findings highlight the positive relationship of quality education with curriculum, few training institutions, corruption in education, teacher behavior, and less research work. These challenges caused restrictions in accomplishing competent teaching and learning with respect to quality education.


Keywords: Curriculum; Corruption; Teacher’s Behavior; Research Work.

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Sain, Z. H. (2023). Challenges in Quality of Education in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) of Pakistan . ELITE JOURNAL, 5(1), 69-76. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/108

References

  1. Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90–126.
  2. Bayraktar E., Tatoglu E., & Zaim, S.(2008), “ An instrument for measuring the critical
  3. factors of TQM in Turkish higher education”, Total Quality Management, Vol. 19, No. 6, 551-574
  4. D’Andrea, V., & Gosling, D. (2005). Improving teaching and learning in higher education: a whole institution approach: a whole institution approach. New York City: McGraw-Hill Education.
  5. Fayyaz, H., Rauf, Z., Umm-e-Kalsoom, & Samin, T. (2014). Major Issues of Education Sector in Pakistan, 3(4), 374-375. DOI: 10.6007/IJARPED/v3-i4/1366.
  6. Gibbs, G. and Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5, 1, 87-100.
  7. Havnes, A., & Stensaker, B. (2006). Educational development centres: from educational to organisational development? Quality Assurance in Education, 14(1), 7–20.
  8. James, V. and James, L. (1998) Higher Education and Total Quality Management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 9, 659-668. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954412988136
  9. Malek A., Kanji G. (2000). “TQM in Malaysian Higher Education Institutions”, Sinergie
  10. rapporti di ricerca n. 9/2000.
  11. Oakland, J. S., & Beardmore, D. (n.d.). Best Practice Customer Service. Total Quality Management, 6(2), 135-148.
  12. Trowler, P., & Bamber, R. (2005). Compulsory higher education teacher training: joined-up policies, institutional architectures and enhancement cultures. International Journal for Academic Development, 10(2), 79–93.