Main Article Content

Abstract

The improvement of students interest and their willingness to study are mostly showed by their experience in the way of learning occurs. In this case the existence of the lecture’s role is very important as facilitator in the class with their good communication, not only transferring the knowledge but also provide a good classroom condition which drive the college students to get their knowledge. Off course this condition should provide them with a good communication skill. Well actually some of them in presenting t the learning process is done without an extensive preparation in the design. The objective of this research is improving the understanding of nonverbal communication attitude phenomenon in teaching learning process in order to improve the quality of it. With an ethnography studies used to reach the goal of the study. While the result shown that; 1) the lecturer applied several kind of nonverbal communication, 2)they face expression mostly with interpersonal relation between lecturer and the college students. 3) the college students have a various response relate with to the lecturer face and eye contact expression. 4) lecturers eyes contact expression indicates whereas he/she pays a good attention to his class or not. This is the meaning of a lecture’s nonverbal communication attitudes for the college student, to prepare them emotions condition in order to join the teaching learning process

Keywords

lecturer, non-verbal communication, college student

Article Details

How to Cite
Gofur, Muhlis, & Rahmawati. (2019). Lecturer’s Nonverbal Communication attitude in Classroom: Its Meaning for College Sudent. ELITE JOURNAL, 1(1), 35-42. Retrieved from https://elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE/article/view/10

References

  1. Brown, G., Yule, G., 1983. Teaching the Spoken Language. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Brown, H.D., Wen, Q.(文秋芳)·, 1994. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Prentice Hall Regents New Jersey.
  3. Brumfit, C.J., Johnson, K., 1979. The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford University Press Oxford.
  4. DePorter, B., Hermacki, M., 1992. Quantum Learning: Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Penerbit Mizan, Bandung.
  5. DePorter, B., Hernacki, M., 1992. Quantum Learning: Unleashing the Genius in You. Dell Publishing.
  6. Fussell, S.R., Moss, M.M., 1998. Figurative language in emotional communication. Soc. Cogn. Approaches Interpers. Commun. 113–141.
  7. Gerlach, V.S., Gerlach, V.S., 1980. Teaching and media : a systematic approach / Vernon S. Gerlach, Donald P. Ely, Rob Melnick, Teaching and media : a systematic approach / Vernon S. Gerlach, Donald P. Ely, Rob Melnick. 1 MEDIA PENGAJARANTeaching Media Syst. Approach Vernon Gerlach Donald P Ely Rob Melnick Teach. Media Syst. Approach Vernon Gerlach Donald P Ely Rob Melnick 1980, 1–99. https://doi.org/1980
  8. Habermas, J., 2000. On the Pragmatics of Communication. MIT Press.
  9. Hickson, M.L., Stacks, D.W., 1992. Nonverbal Communication: Studies and Applications. WCB Brown & Benchmark.
  10. Kemp, J.E., Dayton, D., K., 1985. Planning and Producing Instructional Media. Harper and Row Publisher, New York.
  11. Miller, P.W., 2005. Body Language: An Illustrated Introduction for Teachers. Patrick W. Miller and Associates.
  12. Miller, P.W., 1986. Nonverbal Communication. National Education Association.
  13. Muhadjir, N., 1991. Ilmu Pendidikan dan Perubahan Sosial. Rake Sarasin, Yogyakarta.
  14. Patterson, M.L., 2017. Nonverbal Communication☆, in: Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.06502-0
  15. Pease, A., 1987. Bahasa Tubuh: Bagaimana Membaca Pikiran Seseorang Melalui Gerak Isyarat. Penerbit Arcan, Jakarta.
  16. Richmond, V.P., Prayne, S.K., 1991. Nonverbal Behaviour in Interpersonal Relation. Prentice Hall Regents New Jersey, London.
  17. Sadiman, A.S., Raharjo, R., Haryono, A., 1993. Media Pedidikan: Pengertian, Pengembangan, dan Pemanfaatannya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
  18. Seel, B.B., Richey, R.C., 1994. Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domain of The Field. ABCT, Washington DC.
  19. Spinder, G., 1982. General Introduction on Doing the Etnografy of scholling : Educational Antropology in Action. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.